Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: SHOOTING IT IN THE NET 3 TIMES??? ANYBODY SEE THIS?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Date:
SHOOTING IT IN THE NET 3 TIMES??? ANYBODY SEE THIS?
Permalink Closed


the Canes shot it into our net after the whistle blew THREE SEPERATE TIMES in game 5.  can you believe this?  i was sick to my stomach.  and yet we didn't ruin anybody's face.  then again, if we did we would have been severely penalized.  there really is no justice in this league.  i'm disgusted.



__________________
Go Habs Go


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 762
Date:
Permalink Closed

Oh ya, I mentioned in the game thread a couple of hours ago and I'm still furious over it. This is poor sportsmanship and I was disgusted the habs didn't deal with it. When it's blatant, as it was twice tonight, it warrants an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty...I've seen it called before!

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Date:
Permalink Closed

ya man, i said the same thing...... that's should definitely be a penalty.  but the refs would never call something our way like that.  they'd rather just look the other way when that happens and just WAIT for one of our guys to do something about it, so that we can get stuck with the penalty.

__________________
Go Habs Go


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 134
Date:
Permalink Closed

how about all the Carolina Dives? at one point Staal looked like he was dead, when no penalty was called, he made a miraculous recovery and joined the play. is Greg louganis an assistant coach?

__________________
Habs, Beer, Jimmy Buffett....


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:
Permalink Closed

I mentioned it as well. But the first time ithappned Rivet tried to send a messege to i think Recchi but all they did was exchange words because the reff was in the way. I expect the ref warned Rivet in front of Recchi that if he started another scrum he would get a penelty. This would make sense because the Canes only started putting the puck in late in the third were we couldn't risk a penelty. The reff should have called a unsportsmanlike conduct since it was clearly blatent and unlike Recchi's completly intentional.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard