We all know Don Cherry hates the Habs so when he says something pro Habs it must be pretty obvious. And even he thinks that Brindamours(SP) goal was goaltending interference he even went as fair as saying it was more blatent than the one that was called back. Could this be a case of the ref not wanting to call back two similar plays? For some reason i can't help but think it was.
superhab wrote: We all know Don Cherry hates the Habs so when he says something pro Habs it must be pretty obvious. And even he thinks that Brindamours(SP) goal was goaltending interference he even went as fair as saying it was more blatent than the one that was called back. Could this be a case of the ref not wanting to call back two similar plays? For some reason i can't help but think it was.
No question. It's the same mentality that says, "Oh well, we didn't call that high-sticking-to-the-face penalty last night so we shouldn't call it tonight either."
I won't argue that the Habs played well enough to win tonight. But they shouldn't have lost the way they did.