Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Useless visor design


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1887
Date:
Useless visor design
Permalink Closed


All the tut-tutting that went on when Berard injured his eye...

"Oh, if he'd only been wearing a visor, he'd never have been hurt" and such

This incident with Saks makes at least a dozen eye-related injuries I've seen happen to players wearing visors...

Is it the design? Why aren't the manufacturers called to task? It's beyond me

__________________
THX1138


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 445
Date:
Permalink Closed

 


They only way to really fix the design is to go with the full shield style visor.  But with the resistance to even the half shields its gonna be a long time before we see those in the NHL.



__________________
Go Habs Go


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 762
Date:
Permalink Closed


beakermania wrote:

 
They only way to really fix the design is to go with the full shield style visor.  But with the resistance to even the half shields its gonna be a long time before we see those in the NHL.



Agreed. A visor on Berard likely would have saved his eye, but who knows. The design is useless for sure, but it's what the players want. Most non NHL players have been wearing full cages or the full cage visor combo for years. But with the Don Cherry mentality in the NHL it's more macho to risk your vision. Take a look at the goalie masks with the Cat Eye cages. I beleive they're banned in most leagues except the NHL. Doh, it's the only cage I've ever been able to see out of too

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 445
Date:
Permalink Closed

 


In our mens league visors are not required.  However i always wear a full cage.  I have always worn a cage, you get used to it quickly and it does not impair my vision at all.  Its about 50-50 though guys with cages and visors vs no cages, with a few half visors thrown in but not many.


I do not understand the machoness of this, too many sticks and pucks that can take out an eye, tooth, etc... and i have to work in the morning.  I'll never understand the mentality.  It is easy to fight with a cage/visor, all you do is remove your helmet after dropping the gloves, if both guys really want to go, they do it.



__________________
Go Habs Go


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 312
Date:
Permalink Closed

The visor as it exists now offers such limited protection. A head-on blow will get blocked, but anything from underneath can get up there and wreak havoc. In those cases, the stock can even get stuck up there and cause more damage than it would if there no visor.

A better design would be one that covers the eyes but also prevents a stick from getting in beneath the lower edge of the visor. But this could create fogging issues.

My son had a real bad eye injury playing street hockey that's left him with only 20% of his vision in one eye. He compensates for it well, but has to wear goggles under his cage or use a polycarbonate cage. The poly cage fogs up and so do the glasses, especially when outside temps and humidity are high. It's a real pain, but necessary to protect the one good eye he has left.

All these injuries can be totally prevented by cages, but I think the Kahuna is right. There's a macho side to it that isn't going to be legislated away. Maybe as more college players move up they'll have the sense to stick to the cages they wear in college. I hope so.

Les Canadiens sont la



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard