To set the record straight. My original post was not intended to get everyone riled up. I posted my thoughts on the game. Happened to think koivu had an awsome game and since he did not rack up points...I figured all the technical aspects of his game were worth mentioning. It was a great game by him. I'm not taking it back. Funny though...it was only one paragraph out of about 7. I guess I am not allowed to mention Koivu in any positive manner. So I will not anymore. I will try to be more sensitive to the fact that what I post may be taken the wrong way by certain posters. I actually never thought of And-O or AB. I figured everyone would be happy with the win and looking to post some analysis. I was just excited about the win and at the same time, concerned about the shots on goal. Sorry all. Geesh. Go habs go( Ribby, Sunny, Huet, Souray, Kovalev, and yes Koivu...)
See... now that's childish. Why can't you talk positive about your fav player???? That's why we have a forum. My hubby fawn's over Kovy no matter what the situation is. Sometimes he's a fan to a fault, won't shut up about the dang guy LOL but I would never censor or want him to censor his opinions. Just beware the flack you may create & don't call out people in a brand new thread just to "start something" like this threads purpose was. That's what the first thread was for & it could have been taking care of in there.
Koivu is a good player... why not say it??? Don't censor.... speak... just beware.
Muller93 wrote: To set the record straight. My original post was not intended to get everyone riled up. I posted my thoughts on the game. Happened to think koivu had an awsome game and since he did not rack up points...I figured all the technical aspects of his game were worth mentioning. It was a great game by him. I'm not taking it back. Funny though...it was only one paragraph out of about 7. I guess I am not allowed to mention Koivu in any positive manner. So I will not anymore. I will try to be more sensitive to the fact that what I post may be taken the wrong way by certain posters. I actually never thought of And-O or AB. I figured everyone would be happy with the win and looking to post some analysis. I was just excited about the win and at the same time, concerned about the shots on goal. Sorry all. Geesh. Go habs go( Ribby, Sunny, Huet, Souray, Kovalev, and yes Koivu...) See... now that's childish. Why can't you talk positive about your fav player???? That's why we have a forum. My hubby fawn's over Kovy no matter what the situation is. Sometimes he's a fan to a fault, won't shut up about the dang guy LOL but I would never censor or want him to censor his opinions. Just beware the flack you may create & don't call out people in a brand new thread just to "start something" like this threads purpose was. That's what the first thread was for & it could have been taking care of in there. Koivu is a good player... why not say it??? Don't censor.... speak... just beware. LOL.... I love the itty bitty Koivu you typed -- Edited by MC Girl at 20:39, 2006-04-23
Actually McGirl, I started the second thread because my original post was taken out of context. The posting had spirled into a mess. I mean that original post had all kinds of "other" things. That is what I wanted to talk about. How about those shots on goal 43-24...now that is something worth discussing.
The second thread was to point out the fact that just because a post mentions Koivu positively...amongst many other non-Koivu points...does not make it a "Koivu" post. So as much as I Irespect your thoughts...I think your impression of the intention of my second thread is.. askew
And me not mentioning Koivu is not childish...it's self-preservation. I'm tired and wolves are after me...
MC Girl wrote: Muller93 wrote: To set the record straight. My original post was not intended to get everyone riled up. I posted my thoughts on the game. Happened to think koivu had an awsome game and since he did not rack up points...I figured all the technical aspects of his game were worth mentioning. It was a great game by him. I'm not taking it back. Funny though...it was only one paragraph out of about 7. I guess I am not allowed to mention Koivu in any positive manner. So I will not anymore. I will try to be more sensitive to the fact that what I post may be taken the wrong way by certain posters. I actually never thought of And-O or AB. I figured everyone would be happy with the win and looking to post some analysis. I was just excited about the win and at the same time, concerned about the shots on goal. Sorry all. Geesh. Go habs go( Ribby, Sunny, Huet, Souray, Kovalev, and yes Koivu...) See... now that's childish. Why can't you talk positive about your fav player???? That's why we have a forum. My hubby fawn's over Kovy no matter what the situation is. Sometimes he's a fan to a fault, won't shut up about the dang guy LOL but I would never censor or want him to censor his opinions. Just beware the flack you may create & don't call out people in a brand new thread just to "start something" like this threads purpose was. That's what the first thread was for & it could have been taking care of in there. Koivu is a good player... why not say it??? Don't censor.... speak... just beware. LOL.... I love the itty bitty Koivu you typed -- Edited by MC Girl at 20:39, 2006-04-23 Actually McGirl, I started the second thread because my original post was taken out of context. The posting had spirled into a mess. I mean that original post had all kinds of "other" things. That is what I wanted to talk about. How about those shots on goal 43-24...now that is something worth discussing. The second thread was to point out the fact that just because a post mentions Koivu positively...amongst many other non-Koivu points...does not make it a "Koivu" post. So as much as I Irespect your thoughts...I think your impression of the intention of my second thread is.. askew And me not mentioning Koivu is not childish...it's self-preservation. I'm tired and wolves are after me...
It wasn't taken out of context. If you re-read the reponses..they are based on the silly Saks is brilliant comment. That exageration ruined all your credibility on the other points you made.
Actually McGirl, I started the second thread because my original post was taken out of context. The posting had spirled into a mess. I mean that original post had all kinds of "other" things. That is what I wanted to talk about. How about those shots on goal 43-24...now that is something worth discussing. The second thread was to point out the fact that just because a post mentions Koivu positively...amongst many other non-Koivu points...does not make it a "Koivu" post. So as much as I Irespect your thoughts...I think your impression of the intention of my second thread is.. askew:biggrin: And me not mentioning Koivu is not childish...it's self-preservation. I'm tired and wolves are after me...
I understand your first post was not solely about Koivu... I agreed. You made quite a few great points in it. But your second post was not to talk about the things that got sidetracked, it was to call notice about 2 specific posters. This thread could have been used to talk about the points that were missed as opposed to the reason why they were missed & who was responsible for it... right?
It wasn't taken out of context. If you re-read the reponses..they are based on the silly Saks is brilliant comment. That exageration ruined all your credibility on the other points you made.
See. Why call it silly? I posted my thoughts on the game. I thought he did have a brilliant game. You come back with "silly".
If you want to discuss the game and disagree with me...then fine give me logical reasons...not "silly". Wow AB...you have some real issues eh? It was a 6-1 win and all you can do is chase me around for thinking Koivu had a brilliant game...well excuse me but I really think he did...ask Brindy and his 31 goal season if Koivu had a brillinat game...
Holy smokes...it's getting really cold and that wolf keeps attacking...
AB Habman wrote: That exageration ruined all your credibility on the other points you made. When you're quote is 11 times longer than you're message you're losing credibility AB.
Id like to congradulate EVERYONE who participated in this conflict of opinions. It was kept relatively clean, people didnt get personal, there were still laughs, and in the end, i dont have to do the stats for the hockey pool. Im happy...so everyone else should be! So for now...EVERYONE get back on the bandwagon and cheer on our habs tonight!!! WE GOT A GAME TO WIN!!!
__________________
At just 18, i've got the girl who has said the 6 words i've wanted to hear my whole life!! " My Dad Owns A Liquor Store"
See, this is MUCH better. Id like to congradulate EVERYONE who participated in this conflict of opinions. It was kept relatively clean, people didnt get personal, there were still laughs, and in the end, i dont have to do the stats for the hockey pool. Im happy...so everyone else should be! So for now...EVERYONE get back on the bandwagon and cheer on our habs tonight!!! WE GOT A GAME TO WIN!!!
And let's hope for Saku to be brilliant...again.... For that matter, let's hope for any hab(s) to have a brilliant night.
Who knew that word brilliant could be such a harmful word...
And let's hope for Saku to be brilliant...again.... For that matter, let's hope for any hab(s) to have a brilliant night. Who knew that word brilliant could be such a harmful word...