Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: McKenzie: Will it be Aebischer or Huet?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 506
Date:
McKenzie: Will it be Aebischer or Huet?
Permalink Closed


http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=163129&hubname=nhl

TSN.ca Staff

4/18/2006 7:19:36 PM

There is a lot of intrigue involving the Montreal Canadiens going into the Stanley Cup playoffs, namely who will get the start in net.

Needless to say, there's a lot of talk in Montreal about it.

Will it be Cristobal Huet - who started the team's season finale against the New Jersey Devils - or will it be David Aebischer?

Going into the season finale, Huet had a league-best .930 save percentage with a 2.14 goals-against average and seven shutouts, while Aebischer had an .899 save percentage, 3.09 GAA and three shutouts.

But in his seven starts since joining the Canadiens in a March 8 trade with Colorado for Jose Theodore, Aebischer has an .891 save percentage, 3.72 GAA and no shutouts.



There are those who feel that if the Canadiens face the Ottawa Senators, Aebischer should get the nod in goal. After all, Aebischer defeated the Senators twice in the second-last week of the season.

I suspect that when all is said and done, Aebischer will be the starting goalie for the postseason. He has a little more experience, and a good as Huet has been, there seems to be a sense that the Canadiens will go with that experience.

This will make for a huge controversy in Montreal, because Huet is the guy who put the Habs on his back and carried them into the playoffs.




I don't know if McKenzie is crazy or not, but I sure hope Gainey isn't thinking the same way, because we might be in trouble if he is.

-- Edited by Jedah at 22:46, 2006-04-18

-- Edited by Jedah at 22:50, 2006-04-18

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 312
Date:
Permalink Closed

BG would have to be on drugs to make such a call -- but maybe he is. Did you see him in the interview before the Bufflao game on Saturday -- that business about choosing the starting goalie by shifting marbles around in his pocket? What kind of manure is that? The only possible reason I can fathom for doing that would be to put Huet on notice that the off-season contract negotiations are going to be difficult ones, that BG is ready, willing and able to go with Abby next year if Huet won't kowtow to him. Well, BG, if that's your strategy, you need to fire yourself and find someone with an ounce of sense to take over.

As it turns out, The Habs didn't need the win in Buffalo to make the playoffs. But nobody knew that then. By all measures, Abby is the inferior goaltender. Going with him in such an important game -- at the expense of the guy who got you to the playoffs -- is insanity. Naturally Huet didn't look 100% sharp tonight against NJ after his extended layoff, but he still looked a lot better than Abby has in any game he's played for us.

Maybe Mackenzie and BG know something I don't. But from my standpoint, Abby should ride the bench from now until golf season.

Les Canadiens sont la

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Jedah wrote:
I don't know if McKenzie is crazy or not, but I sure hope Gainey isn't thinking the same way, because we might be in trouble if he is.-- Edited by Jedah at 22:46, 2006-04-18-- Edited by Jedah at 22:50, 2006-04-18

Right now thats the least of our concerns. It doesn't matter if Patrick Roy himself was in the net we still have problems on offense and defense.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 506
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sure we have problems. So why add to them? And honestly, until the 3rd period collapse, the guys played a great game, I thought.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 762
Date:
Permalink Closed

I feel the same way Jeddah, what I saw of the first 50 minutes or so, Habs were dominating. Jersey was just WAY too hungry once they got that Gionta goal that should have been called back...and they had a lot to be hungry for with the division title in sight.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:
Permalink Closed


Jedah wrote:


Sure we have problems. So why add to them? And honestly, until the 3rd period collapse, the guys played a great game, I thought.


Recently its been all third period collapses. against Buffalo. Against Boston where they almost blew it. And again against New Jersey.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 675
Date:
Permalink Closed

The Kahuna wrote:


Jersey was just WAY too hungry once they got that Gionta goal that should have been called back...

Why would they call that one back?  It was a goal.

__________________
"To you with falling hands we throw the torch. Be yours to hold it high."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 371
Date:
Permalink Closed

24: Gionta clearly caught the puck, closed his hand on it, skated across the crease, dropped the puck on his stick, and put it into the empty net.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 675
Date:
Permalink Closed

I disagree.  I didn't see him close his hand on it.  He just pawed it down and managed to get it on his stick.  Either way, they played like crap in the 3rd and didn't deserve it.  Win or lose it made no difference in the standings, it only hurt their very fragile confidence.

__________________
"To you with falling hands we throw the torch. Be yours to hold it high."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 371
Date:
Permalink Closed

24: I agree that the loss meant more emotionally than anything else. Tough come-down from such a big high after the first 38 minutes.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard