Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Yet another Shootout bash


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:
Yet another Shootout bash
Permalink Closed


Previously when i had bashed shootouts one of the responses i got was some overtimes are not exciting. I think this is because shootout teams like Dallas don't want them to be, they would rather play defensive because they know there steller in shootouts (11 Wins). Atlanta is the same thing the have won 6. While montreal has only had three because they go all out in OT and its exciting. IF there were no shootouts preceding the OT, OT would be much more exciting.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1612
Date:
Permalink Closed

I say just play ot until there is a winner and dump shootout business

__________________
The Cup Stops Here


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:
Permalink Closed

Apparently, the shootout was put in place to grow market. "Fans" love it. In the near future we'll probably 3 on 3 before a shootout and no points awarded for OT/Shoot Out losses. That will make real fans proud. How the stadings would be different if it weren't for OT.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Date:
Permalink Closed


Figaro wrote:

Apparently, the shootout was put in place to grow market. "Fans" love it. In the near future we'll probably 3 on 3 before a shootout and no points awarded for OT/Shoot Out losses. That will make real fans proud. How the stadings would be different if it weren't for OT.



I will repeat myself:
should be 3 pts for win, 2 pts for OT or shootout win, 1 pt. for OT or shootout loss, 0 pts for regulation loss.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1081
Date:
Permalink Closed


plouf wrote:


I will repeat myself:
should be 3 pts for win, 2 pts for OT or shootout win, 1 pt. for OT or shootout loss, 0 pts for regulation loss.




Agreed.

Habtastic

__________________
http://habtastic.typepad.com/


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 762
Date:
Permalink Closed

Keep the the OT, keep shootout...but ZERO points for ANY loss. The shootout as well as OT was put in to eliminate ties, super, now eliminate the 1 point associated with the tie. 2 points for a win, 0 points for a loss.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Date:
Permalink Closed


The Kahuna wrote:

Keep the the OT, keep shootout...but ZERO points for ANY loss. The shootout as well as OT was put in to eliminate ties, super, now eliminate the 1 point associated with the tie. 2 points for a win, 0 points for a loss.



That would also be fine by me.

What I hate is the incentive to go for the minimum one point late in a tied game. Two teams that tie get 3 points between them, while a clear decision is worth 2 points? Garbage.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 762
Date:
Permalink Closed


plouf wrote:


That would also be fine by me.

What I hate is the incentive to go for the minimum one point late in a tied game. Two teams that tie get 3 points between them, while a clear decision is worth 2 points? Garbage.




Yep, the current rules reward you for playing in a defensive shell for the 3rd period...play to win!

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard