Well, I have been off-line for some five hours, so I've been catching up on the Koivu/Plekanec/Ribeiro/throw-Bonk-in-there-too battles between John, AB, Muller and And-o, among others. It was like deja vu all over again..........
How about we try this for some objective evidence: look at every player's salary and point production, and calculate their dollars-per-point cost. You'd have to "normalize" the points to gross them up to a full year, so injuries are factored out of the equation. Would that make some sense? I'd do it, but don't have the salaries down. Maybe someone could give it a whirl?
Now, I know this analysis would ignore certain non-empirical things: value as a defensive player, extra duty on PP and PK, emotional leadership, etc. (Maybe we could try a dollars per post-game interview stat!) But it's a start.
But then again maybe not. Koivu likely makes twice Ribeiro's salary, but doesn't have twice the points, but I'd still rather have him on my team. And Bonk's salary and meagre point total likely still stacks him up there on a cost-per-point figure due to a relatively low salary. So perhaps it's a stupid stat...............
Anyway, it might be a fun excercise. Anyone want to try? Or give me the raw data and I'll do it. I'm the unemployed accountant, after all!
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I have a better idea, Why not justify the pro Saks arguements with the comparisons of other first line centers in the league?
The way Bonk and Ribs have played thus far, actually makes Saks seem above average until you compare him to his first line center peers through out the league!
I have a better idea, Why not justify the pro Saks arguements with the comparisons of other first line centers in the league? The way Bonk and Ribs have played thus far, actually makes Saks seem above average until you compare him to his first line center peers through out the league!
Alright, line up all first-line NHL centremen who have played 30 games or more, arranged in order of points per game. Where is Koivu in that list?
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
AB Habman wrote: I have a better idea, Why not justify the pro Saks arguements with the comparisons of other first line centers in the league? The way Bonk and Ribs have played thus far, actually makes Saks seem above average until you compare him to his first line center peers through out the league! Alright, line up all first-line NHL centremen who have played 30 games or more, arranged in order of points per game. Where is Koivu in that list?
I don't know who's centering #1 lines on other teams, but I looked at all the NHL stats. There are 30 teams, which equates to 120 centremen. His PPG stands him 29th overall among centremen. Many above him are on the same teams. Still, 29th out of 120 centremen puts him in the top quartile in the league.
Works for me.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I have a better idea, Why not justify the pro Saks arguements with the comparisons of other first line centers in the league? The way Bonk and Ribs have played thus far, actually makes Saks seem above average until you compare him to his first line center peers through out the league!
Well, we're all Hab fans, aren't we? It's only natural that we would compare Saku with other players we know well.
Can you argue that Koivu has not been the Habs' best forward this year?
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I think there are two ways to settle this: 1) If he signs with the Habs next year. We know that he is wanted here and he wants to be here. Unless we are part of the talks, we won't know who doesn't want who if he doesn't sign. 2) If he doesn't sign we need to track how his play is without being with the Habs next year.
OK, if it's (2), you've got the job!
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I think there are two ways to settle this: 1) If he signs with the Habs next year. We know that he is wanted here and he wants to be here. Unless we are part of the talks, we won't know who doesn't want who if he doesn't sign. 2) If he doesn't sign we need to track how his play is without being with the Habs next year.
Guys. My argument has never been that Koivu is the best player in the game. I do think he has been shafted in Montreal due to a complete lack of support. But my point of view has always been that Koivu is a great little player that ALL teams in the NHL would love to have. But I have never called him a a definite number one guy for all teams. But so what.
Face it. He is pretty dam good. He gets points, grinds, plays defense, plays the PP and PK. What is the issue? Yes, I would love another center on the habs. Even a guy who becomes the top center. But for the love of god, just support our better players. You don't have to think he is the almighty.
But if you are truly a habs fan, then what is the issue? That's all I ever point out in my posts. I don't know where the "saint saku" stuff came from. He is Montreal's best all around player. OK that may not be saying much if you like, but whatever...we should be supporting our best players, not dogging them eh?
Unless someone can make a viable argument that Koivu is not the habs best player...? anyone?
JohnM wrote: I think there are two ways to settle this: 1) If he signs with the Habs next year. We know that he is wanted here and he wants to be here. Unless we are part of the talks, we won't know who doesn't want who if he doesn't sign. 2) If he doesn't sign we need to track how his play is without being with the Habs next year. Guys. My argument has never been that Koivu is the best player in the game. I do think he has been shafted in Montreal due to a complete lack of support. But my point of view has always been that Koivu is a great little player that ALL teams in the NHL would love to have. But I have never called him a a definite number one guy for all teams. But so what. Face it. He is pretty dam good. He gets points, grinds, plays defense, plays the PP and PK. What is the issue? Yes, I would love another center on the habs. Even a guy who becomes the top center. But for the love of god, just support our better players. You don't have to think he is the almighty. But if you are truly a habs fan, then what is the issue? That's all I ever point out in my posts. I don't know where the "saint saku" stuff came from. He is Montreal's best all around player. OK that may not be saying much if you like, but whatever...we should be supporting our best players, not dogging them eh? Unless someone can make a viable argument that Koivu is not the habs best player...? anyone?
The voice of reason, as always, Muller (And-o, AB, feel free to disagree.) And you repeat my question (see my post, above) to AB: Can anyone say Koivu is not our best player this year? Explain. You will be graded on clarity of argument, empirical evidence to back up your argument, and sentence structure.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Can anyone say Koivu is not our best player this year? Explain. You will be graded on clarity of argument, empirical evidence to back up your argument, and sentence structure. :
Nil'd: You and I on the same page once again. This should be interesting.
JohnM wrote: I think there are two ways to settle this: 1) If he signs with the Habs next year. We know that he is wanted here and he wants to be here. Unless we are part of the talks, we won't know who doesn't want who if he doesn't sign. 2) If he doesn't sign we need to track how his play is without being with the Habs next year. Guys. My argument has never been that Koivu is the best player in the game. I do think he has been shafted in Montreal due to a complete lack of support. But my point of view has always been that Koivu is a great little player that ALL teams in the NHL would love to have. But I have never called him a a definite number one guy for all teams. But so what. Face it. He is pretty dam good. He gets points, grinds, plays defense, plays the PP and PK. What is the issue? Yes, I would love another center on the habs. Even a guy who becomes the top center. But for the love of god, just support our better players. You don't have to think he is the almighty. But if you are truly a habs fan, then what is the issue? That's all I ever point out in my posts. I don't know where the "saint saku" stuff came from. He is Montreal's best all around player. OK that may not be saying much if you like, but whatever...we should be supporting our best players, not dogging them eh? Unless someone can make a viable argument that Koivu is not the habs best player...? anyone?
But you can make that case for all the top players on the team! Like so; Kovalev-he is not receiving any support, thats why he is not performing. Zednik-he is not recieving any support, thats why he is not performing. Ribs- See the pattern? Like i said you can make the "he is not recieving any support" case for all the players!
Muller93 wrote: JohnM wrote: I think there are two ways to settle this: 1) If he signs with the Habs next year. We know that he is wanted here and he wants to be here. Unless we are part of the talks, we won't know who doesn't want who if he doesn't sign. 2) If he doesn't sign we need to track how his play is without being with the Habs next year. Guys. My argument has never been that Koivu is the best player in the game. I do think he has been shafted in Montreal due to a complete lack of support. But my point of view has always been that Koivu is a great little player that ALL teams in the NHL would love to have. But I have never called him a a definite number one guy for all teams. But so what. Face it. He is pretty dam good. He gets points, grinds, plays defense, plays the PP and PK. What is the issue? Yes, I would love another center on the habs. Even a guy who becomes the top center. But for the love of god, just support our better players. You don't have to think he is the almighty. But if you are truly a habs fan, then what is the issue? That's all I ever point out in my posts. I don't know where the "saint saku" stuff came from. He is Montreal's best all around player. OK that may not be saying much if you like, but whatever...we should be supporting our best players, not dogging them eh? Unless someone can make a viable argument that Koivu is not the habs best player...? anyone? The voice of reason, as always, Muller (And-o, AB, feel free to disagree.) And you repeat my question (see my post, above) to AB: Can anyone say Koivu is not our best player this year? Explain. You will be graded on clarity of argument, empirical evidence to back up your argument, and sentence structure.
In my opinion, there has not been a best offensive player on the Habs this year. Its been a different player almost every game. Now if you talk about Best player on the team, No question Markov!
But you can make that case for all the top players on the team! Like so; Kovalev-he is not receiving any support, thats why he is not performing. Zednik-he is not recieving any support, thats why he is not performing. Ribs- See the pattern? Like i said you can make the "he is not recieving any support" case for all the players!
O K. But I notice you avoid the real question in that post.
Sorry Saku11. I did not see your response to Nil'd.
I'll buy that. Markov has been a pretty good suprise this year. Although I think we always knew he had the talent.
As for your " it's been a different forward every game" argument. That response seems... just a little slimy to me. Are you a lawyer? A politician? Rick Tochett?...
My issue has been and always will be with 2 things. Plain and simple and in spite of some on this board trying to imply that I am bias due to my relationship with CJ (which is just plain bull) I have been very consistent on this point since the seasons started (which I belivee was long before Julien got canned?). My points are this:
Koivu is not a number one center. In fact, I believe he ranks about 41st in the league in points for Centers. That pretty much says it all to me. He has been overused and is worn out and that is not his fault. As for a "lack of support" he has had to play with in Montreal I would think that most NHL Centers would give their right arm to have Kovalev on their right side? With the amount of ice time he gets and the PP opp's, one would expect more ..but in fairness, Sundin has not been any better so it is hard to compare
My bigger issue is more with his leadership and captaincy. If you watch him unbiasedly and how he has handled certain situations this year, one has to question whether he can, or even wants to, lead this team. Situations like not talking to the media Tuesday night after the game and leaving Begin to do it are, in my mind, totally unacceptable. Now maybe he had a good reason. But if he did then that needs to be made clear.
__________________
________________
I'm as confused as a starving baby in a topless bar!
Koivu is not a number one center. In fact, I believe he ranks about 41st in the league in points for Centers. That pretty much says it all to me. He has been overused and is worn out and that is not his fault. As for a "lack of support" he has had to play with in Montreal I would think that most NHL Centers would give their right arm to have Kovalev on their right side? With the amount of ice time he gets and the PP opp's, one would expect more ..but in fairness, Sundin has not been any better so it is hard to compare
From NHL.com as of today:
__________________
I walked past a restaurant yesterday that had a sign in the window that said, "Lobster Tail and Beer." I went in, since I enjoy all three.