Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Sum it up


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 878
Date:
Sum it up
Permalink Closed


Basically we have a pretty decent team on paper. But the problem is:


1. Just plain bad goaltending. This will deflate any team. Contrary to what many of you guys think about the "team effort", on some nights I though the habs effort was there, just got the wind taken out of the sails due to shoddy goaltending


2. Anyone notice that the habs have no one that drives to the net? Am I the only one who notices that we have practically every player playing  "peripheral hockey". Koivu despite being little is the only guy who does it( example--goal against the leafs). This is not really an effort thing, just a style of hockey thing. We have a lot of peripheral guys.


3 No second line center---Thanx Ribeiro.


soooo. If Theo had earned his 5.5 mil and Ribiero was actually a threat(never was). We may have been OK. The only problem that does not have an "internal" fix is our lack of ability to drive to the net. We need a couple of "attackers". Not big time goal scorers, just guys who create havoc in a productive way.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 878
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sorry, maybe Begin drives to the net...

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3191
Date:
Permalink Closed

Muller93 wrote:


Basically we have a pretty decent team on paper. But the problem is: 1. Just plain bad goaltending. This will deflate any team. Contrary to what many of you guys think about the "team effort", on some nights I though the habs effort was there, just got the wind taken out of the sails due to shoddy goaltending 2. Anyone notice that the habs have no one that drives to the net? Am I the only one who notices that we have practically every player playing  "peripheral hockey". Koivu despite being little is the only guy who does it( example--goal against the leafs). This is not really an effort thing, just a style of hockey thing. We have a lot of peripheral guys. 3 No second line center---Thanx Ribeiro. soooo. If Theo had earned his 5.5 mil and Ribiero was actually a threat(never was). We may have been OK. The only problem that does not have an "internal" fix is our lack of ability to drive to the net. We need a couple of "attackers". Not big time goal scorers, just guys who create havoc in a productive way.

Muller I cannot disagree with you on most points..however let me add this. When you are averaging 16 shots a game in the new "free wheeling NHL", covering your net with plywood will not win you games. And 2. Yes Saks droive the net against the Leafs. My porblem is that (and this goes for EVERY player on that team), where does he disappear to the next night? Like Kovalev, we get one good night..then these guys stop doing what made them successful.

__________________
________________ I'm as confused as a starving baby in a topless bar!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 878
Date:
Permalink Closed

16 shots: Wind out of sails...It happens when your goaltending takes away your momentum. Hockey is a game of momentum. 16 shots...poor momentum, not lack of effort for the most part. IMO

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3191
Date:
Permalink Closed

Muller93 wrote:


16 shots: Wind out of sails...It happens when your goaltending takes away your momentum. Hockey is a game of momentum. 16 shots...poor momentum, not lack of effort for the most part. IMO

so what was the excuse Thursday against Boston? Huet stops 37 shots, inluding a penalty shot..and we muster 16 shots on Thomas..hmmmm. What more do we want form a goalie? EVen the Philly win where Huet was outsanding..we had 17 shots buT bullis got lucky.

__________________
________________ I'm as confused as a starving baby in a topless bar!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 239
Date:
Permalink Closed

Certainly Theodore's horrid goaltending has gone a long way to undermining this season. Nonethless as evidenced by Thursday's night game against Boston this team has a myriad of other problems. Out worked, out hustled and once again badly outshot. Muller is correct the forwards are content to play on the perhipery, they don't want to pay the price by driving to the net.


    This is a very soft team, in every respect. Outside of Begin no forward is willing to block a shot. The team gets one soft goal scored against them they pack it in. When they finally get supplied with strong goaltending from Huet, their response is to be out shot 37-16.


    In the final 8 minutes of the game against Boston they finally play with desperation and intensitity of a team on the verge of being knocked out of the playoff race. Where was that effort through out the game? Zednik had some terrific shifts late in the game why has he not been doing that on a nightly basis?


    Hopefulyy once this nightmarish season ends Gainey will be able to do an effective makeover of the team. Until then perhaps with Markov coming back and Huet continuing to give them solid goaltending they can try and rally as a team, although I would not bet on it.



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 62
Date:
Permalink Closed

it must be Ribeiro's fault.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 918
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thrice wrote:


it must be Ribeiro's fault.

LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
I walked past a restaurant yesterday that had a sign in the window that said, "Lobster Tail and Beer." I went in, since I enjoy all three.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard