If you are interested in a study that was conducted recently regarding European players coming to North America, this link is for you. Alot of surprising data here. This is a PDF file
The primary conclusions of the study are: ++ Too many Europeans who are not of NHL-calibre are signed by NHL-clubs.
++ Too many Europeans who are potentially of NHL-calibre but not yet NHL-ready, are signed prematurely.
++ The average quality of European-trained NHL players remaining in their European clubs until they are NHL-ready is vastly superior to the quality of Europeans spending significant time in the minor leagues or who go through the major junior system.
++ The often repeated theory that a European player needs 'adjustment' and 'time to learn' the North American game is not supported in the data from the research.
++ The recruiting of European players under development is a threat to the quality of the top European leagues and to the European development system as the European clubs are not able to adequately replace the players. This is also a threat to the NHL as a decline of quality of the European leagues will put in danger further development of players of NHL-calibre.
"The findings of the study support our concern that too many players who are not NHL-ready leave the European leagues and never reach their potential," says IIHF President René Fasel. "This is detrimental both to the NHL and to the top European leagues. It is now the duty of the global hockey community to address this issue for the benefit of all leagues as well as international hockey."
And-o often wonders how North American NHL'ers would fair playing in Europe LONGTERM!!!
So far from home...different food...different place...different culture...different language...it can't be that easy!!!?
How good would Jagr (just for example) be playing on home soil every game??? Kovy?? Federov? OV? etc.....???
Interesting though, eh!??!
You often see the same thing in other sports. Players who look good in one context aren't right for another. But anyway... I don't know how this study can really determine who is more talented, for example...seems fishy to me. How does one exactly tell the difference between NHL-calibre and not NHL-calibre. Clearly a player who is NHL-calibre might not make it in the NHL for off-ice related reasons, or just not fitting with the style of game. (cf. Bryan Fogarty for an example of the first)
Keep in mind what the IIHF would like this study to say. Basically the IIHF's (laudable, but still biased when it comes to a study like this) agenda is much like FIFA's in soccer, or for that matter the UN's in world politics. It is against centralization of hockey's money and talent in one place (in this case North America). What would be REALLY surprising would be if the study said something like: "Europeans would do well to go to the OHL for junior hockey, because it would help their development."