JACK TODD, The GazettePublished: Sunday, September 24, 2006
This city is suffering from a bad case of hockey dementia. What else can you say when a sell-out crowd of 21,273 turns out to watch a fundamentally meaningless exhibition scrimmage between the Canadiens and the hated Maple Leafs?
Especially after the local heroes lost their fourth straight preseason game, 4-3 to the Leafs.
Neither of the teams on the ice last night bore much resemblance to the lineups that will start the season for the two erstwhile Original Six powerhouses. The hockey was lacklustre at best and yet there they were, crammed to the rafters in the game's biggest barn to see what Staffan Kronwall, Andy Wozniew-ski, Andre Benoit and Ryan O'Byrne had to offer.
Perhaps we should count our blessings: Last night's contest took place without the usual complement of post-lobotomy Leaf fans in the building and the Canadiens got a little offence going, with the help of a raft of Toronto penalties and a three-point night from defenceman Mark Streit.
But two of the goals came from the top line, with Saku Koivu and Michael Ryder scoring.
The second line looked better, with Corey Locke taking Mike Ribeiro's place between Alex Kovalev and Sergei Samsonov (and with Guillaume Latendresse taking Locke's place on the power play), but still had nothing to show for their night's work - except a minus-2 across the board.
As Guy Carbonneau shifted his lines in the third period, Samsonov saw less and less time on the ice: he finished with 11:29 to Locke's 13:06 and Kovalev's 19:27, the most for any Montreal forward.
Despite the meaninglessness of the games, there has to be a little concern - especially with the chemistry on the second line - after the Canadiens have been outscored 17-7 through these four losses, all at the hands of their most bitter rivals, the Leafs and the Boston Bruins.
Canadiens GM Bob Gainey raised a few eyebrows during the offseason when he decided to commit $1.9 million of that precious salary-cap space to sign Ribeiro to a one-year deal even though he was coming off a sub-par season. No one asked many questions about the signing of Samsonov as a free agent after the Canadiens were unable to land Brendan Shanahan, but there will be questions if Samsonov doesn't begin to click with his linemates.
The fact that questions about his work ethic have persisted this far into Ribeiro's career is not encouraging, nor was his performance through his first two games between Samsonov and Kovalev. The consensus is that Ribeiro is too slow for that line and that in any case, you can't have three guys on the ice who are all used to playing with the puck.
If Ribeiro is not to be the second-line centre, then who is?
Off his performance at the end of last season and through the playoff series against the Carolina Hurricanes, the best candidate would be Tomas Plekanec, but at this point in his career, Plekanec isn't going to strike much fear in opposing goaltenders.
Overall, however, Carbonneau was happier with last night's performance.
"The game in Toronto, I was disappointed," the coach said. "I didn't hide it.
"Tonight, we had a better effort. We had lapses - we still have to play a good 60 minutes - but it was more what I've been looking for."
As for Kovalev and Samsonov, Carbonneau said: "I'm still looking for a better chemistry between the two. It's not easy for Sergei. A guy like Mike Johnson, he's used to playing different roles, it's easier for him to work in with a new team. A guy like Sergei, it's a little bit hard.
"Maybe he's thinking too much - he just has to work and his talent will take over. Tonight, I changed the lines again from the beginning of the second period, just to see what will click."
Still, Carbonneau said he's not concerned.
"I'm not concerned. I'm worried like you always worry. From the first day of training camp, you wish everyone was at 100 per cent, but it doesn't happen. When you get to your 10th, 12th, 15th year, you try to pace yourself because you know the season starts in October, not September.
"Some players are born to do this every day, they don't care whether it's September or June, they give it 150 per cent."
Samsonov, clearly, is not like that. Nor, as we know, is Ribeiro.
When the season starts Oct. 6, we'll see who is going to show up and who isn't.
Until then, it's just something else to talk about around the water cooler.
In my opinion, this year will be a test for the theories that Russians are gutless. We have three integral parts of the team tied up in the Russian form( Kovalev, Sampsonov, Markov).
I am not one for stereotyping, and thus was excited when we landed Sampsonov. However, if history is any indication, I wonder how wise the "Russian-force" choice Gainey has selected was? Time will tell. If pre-season is any indication...gutless.
Or does Gainey have little choice? Few Canadian boys care to play under the stupidity of ther french media, whereas Russians view playing for the habs as the pinnacle...?
In my opinion, this year will be a test for the theories that Russians are gutless. We have three integral parts of the team tied up in the Russian form( Kovalev, Sampsonov, Markov).
I am not one for stereotyping, and thus was excited when we landed Sampsonov. However, if history is any indication, I wonder how wise the "Russian-force" choice Gainey has selected was? Time will tell. If pre-season is any indication...gutless.
Or does Gainey have little choice? Few Canadian boys care to play under the stupidity of ther french media, whereas Russians view playing for the habs as the pinnacle...?
I agree Muller. That's what makes Ovechkin so special. He plays with passion every game and cares about his team improving.
To add to the above....Gainey signed Kovy's twin brother. Now management and fans will have twice the frustrations when they're sleeping and twice the excitement when they decide to play. Anson Carter could of been had rather than Sammy! It fooled Gainey because Sammy was the last free agent face in the playoffs. That doesn't mean he's special. Ask Oilers and Boston.
In my opinion, this year will be a test for the theories that Russians are gutless. We have three integral parts of the team tied up in the Russian form( Kovalev, Sampsonov, Markov).
I am not one for stereotyping, and thus was excited when we landed Sampsonov. However, if history is any indication, I wonder how wise the "Russian-force" choice Gainey has selected was? Time will tell. If pre-season is any indication...gutless.
Or does Gainey have little choice? Few Canadian boys care to play under the stupidity of ther french media, whereas Russians view playing for the habs as the pinnacle...?
Ahhh yes.;.here we go. As I had stated, the season has not even started and we have questions at center. Gonna be another longggggg year.
__________________
________________
I'm as confused as a starving baby in a topless bar!
barry in all fairness we new ribs was going to be the gamble , gainey said this himself . its like playing the same numbers on the lottery week after week , you hope the next week is the time they come up , if ribs doesnt hit the jackpot soon (this year) gainey will be playing different numbers next year, unlike last year we have a little more depth this year , plecs or johnson could fill in for ribs and i dont think we would miss to much .
macneil wrote: barry in all fairness we new ribs was going to be the gamble , gainey said this himself . its like playing the same numbers on the lottery week after week , you hope the next week is the time they come up , if ribs doesnt hit the jackpot soon (this year) gainey will be playing different numbers next year, unlike last year we have a little more depth this year , plecs or johnson could fill in for ribs and i dont think we would miss to much .
On one hand Gainey states it's a gamble on the other...based on Ribs points from last season, he gives him a juicy raise.
It's not easy for Sergei. A guy like Mike Johnson, he's used to playing different roles, it's easier for him to work in with a new team. A guy like Sergei, it's a little bit hard.
What does that statement tell you guys? Johnson is more usefull and Sammy is one demensional. Johnson is at least a complete hockey player where as for Sammy...it's a who knows scenario.
I agree with what you all are saying but I should correct one thing.
Samsonov did not score that consistently in the playoffs, but still put up ok numbers. However he was a force on the ice most of the time, constantly breaking up plays and skating like a maniac. He showed a lot of desire. I don't think the Oilers had any complaints.