... and off he went again ...

brooklynhabfan · Guru

... and off he went again ...

MC Girl · Guru

Say it ain't so Brooklyn

I hope you're just taking a small hiatus to create another awesome film

or you are just saying that so you won't be blamed if our outcome isn't so good tonight. LOL

Come back soon

-- Edited by MC Girl at 19:40, 2006-04-04

habgirl · Guru

Hey, wassup?

I don't recall seeing anything from Brook that was untoward?

Ug!

The Kahuna · Guru

I've got to put my 2 cents in. If you're losing a poster with 1200 plus posts, maybe we have to acknowledge that something is not right here. I haven't had any of my threads or posts deleted, but I have to admit that I'm not a big fan of heavy handed moderation.

Nil d · Guru

brooklynhabfan wrote:

Sorry to say that due to the Code being a little vague, and as a result my being admonished for something I wouldn't interpret as a violation, that I'll be popping off again until there's some sort of loosening of these restrictions. Good luck to all, and if I don't see you again before the playoffs GO HABS GO!!!!!!

When and where did that happen?

Anybody????????

C'mon Brook, hang in here..................

Johab · Guru

im just as lost as you are Nild...at the moment im taking the And-o approach...and keeping my hands off the posts unless they are over the edge....

JohnM · Guru

Johab wrote:

im just as lost as you are Nild...at the moment im taking the And-o approach...and keeping my hands off the posts unless they are over the edge....

Maybe the other moderators could do the same... This way we don't waste so much time on threads like this.

Figaro · Guru

I suggest those who don't know what's up read the threads Everyone PLEASE read this.... and kevin sucks to get a better idea. I explain the reason in both - if you want to banter back and forth about a mutual dislike, do that through your personal email. People do not want to read about that kind of thing. When they google a habs chat site, they aren't trying to find a debate over who's fault it was that member X doesn't post anymore. I explained in more detail to those involved and will not explain further in a public post. I understand that adhering to a new set of standards will take some time to get used to. The spirit of the rules are what's important.

keVin · Member

good ol' forum fan and habarounie...one of a kind.

The Kahuna · Guru

I've said it before and I'll say it again, OVER moderating will kill a forum faster than anything you're trying to protect us from. Maybe a 10 second delay on the trigger finger is in order!

plouf · Guru

"When they google a habs chat site"

Who are the new rules for anyway?

I'm a pretty religious poster around here (as in I read nearly every post) and I didn't see anything remotely offensive by anyone. I will say again, in agreement with And-o and brooklyn, et al.... Moderators would do best to avoid deleting posts unless there is absolutely no doubt it is necessary.

MrsHab · Veteran Member

Nil d wrote:

When and where did that happen?Anybody???????? C'mon Brook, hang in here..................

I don't get it either, Nil and McGirl....but then that's nothing new for me.

This coming from someone who is sometimes a little too sensitive.....and has to have things explained more than once.

Brook......don't abandon ship.....I love the comic relief...sometimes it gets way to heavy around here.

Nil d · Guru

MrsHab wrote:

I don't get it either, Nil and McGirl....but then that's nothing new for me. This coming from someone who ..... has to have things explained more than once.

I love that self-deprecating humour, Mrs. H! That means................. oh, you got it?!

OK...................

Isn't it fun when we win all the time?!

MC Girl · Guru

Nil d wrote:

I love that self-deprecating humour, Mrs. H! That means................. oh, you got it?!OK................... Isn't it fun when we win all the time?!

Can't say I've ever said..... Gosh darn it, We won again! LOL

Winning all the time is the greatest feeling in the world.

MrsHab · Veteran Member

Nil d wrote:

MrsHab wrote: I don't get it either, Nil and McGirl....but then that's nothing new for me. This coming from someone who ..... has to have things explained more than once. I love that self-deprecating humour, Mrs. H! That means................. oh, you got it?!OK................... Isn't it fun when we win all the time?!

Oh Yeah! I'm a happy girl....isn't that a song? Kind of like, "Don't worry, be happy"?

Saku11 · Senior Member

Oh cmon already stop this sobbing feel bad for me crap! get over it!!!!!

barry33 · Guru

What is truly disappointing is that I was just about to post my new Avator with me in my habs thong sipping on a Captain Morgamn and Coke, but now feel I best not..oh well go habbers..your loss!

Nil d · Guru

barry33 wrote:

What is truly disappointing is that I was just about to post my new Avator with me in my habs thong sipping on a Captain Morgamn and Coke, but now feel I best not..oh well go habbers..your loss!

How about you put up a partial picture - say from the eyebrows up............

Barry, do you feel Huet was screened on that weak goal? I can't quite figure out if the defenseman (Souray?) was in the way or not........ either way, I'll certainly forgive him that one!

Jonny G · Senior Member

Nil d wrote:

Barry, do you feel Huet was screened on that weak goal? I can't quite figure out if the defenseman (Souray?) was in the way or not........ either way, I'll certainly forgive him that one!

I'm not Barry, but I'll respond. It lookes as though Souray was (partially, at least) screening the shot -- which was a left-handed shot from the right wing. Although Huet had to worry more about the far-side than if a right-handed shot was coming down the wing, it seems as though he missed the angle on the short-side. The shot wasn't particularly difficult, and if Huet had been well-positioned (as he typically is), then the puck would have hit his pad.

barry33 · Guru

Nil d wrote:

barry33 wrote: What is truly disappointing is that I was just about to post my new Avator with me in my habs thong sipping on a Captain Morgamn and Coke, but now feel I best not..oh well go habbers..your loss! How about you put up a partial picture - say from the eyebrows up............ Barry, do you feel Huet was screened on that weak goal? I can't quite figure out if the defenseman (Souray?) was in the way or not........ either way, I'll certainly forgive him that one!

Actually I felt it was a combination of things..he seemed to be cheating a little bit and looking for a pass and Shelly's ass seemed to be partially blocking his sight line. As a goalie, it is really how you recover from a weak goal that makes you good..and Huet certainly does that. The guy is unflappable.

The Kahuna · Guru

barry33 wrote:

Actually I felt it was a combination of things..he seemed to be cheating a little bit and looking for a pass and Shelly's ass seemed to be partially blocking his sight line. As a goalie, it is really how you recover from a weak goal that makes you good..and Huet certainly does that. The guy is unflappable.

Uhoh, now you're in for it...talking thongs and hockey are not in the spirit of this thread...could a closing be far behind