Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: What were we thinking?!?!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:
What were we thinking?!?!
Permalink Closed


Asham, Rusinsky, Tucker, Recchi, Malakhov, Conroy and Hossa all reagistered points tonight.  What were we thinking letting these guys go!     


 


The sky is falling!  The sky is falling!



-- Edited by Figaro at 21:47, 2005-10-20

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1350
Date:
RE: What were we thinking!!
Permalink Closed


The only guy on that list i regret not keeping is Recchi. The rest arent worth keeping, were never consistant and or where problems in the locker room. The reason we got rid of these guys was because they had no place on our team. Where would you stick ANY on those guys with exception to Recchi. Asham- We have ours and an even better on in Begin Rusinsky good but no room for his soft play and inconsistancy Tucker a problem all around, Recchi only good guy on this list, Malakhov we ALL know why hes gone, Conroy wasnt half as good then as he is now and Hossa had his shot...its time for the guys who earned it to have theirs.

__________________
At just 18, i've got the girl who has said the 6 words i've wanted to hear my whole life!! " My Dad Owns A Liquor Store"


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 444
Date:
RE: What were we thinking?!?!
Permalink Closed


Well the Asham/Czerkawzki trade is something to be debated in another post, but I still think Asham was/is a promising player.

-- Edited by Zulrath at 12:32, 2005-10-21

__________________
Canada Post: From anywhere....to anyone....literally


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Johab i agree with you 100 percent, i love(d) Recchi and i still hope him the best. There are two goals that always stand out in my mind for the Habs (Didn't get to see the best ones live, did see the replays but thats not as fun) One was in the playoffs when Recchi batted the puck out of midair on his own rebound, the other was a two on zero rush where the puck seemed to be bouncing of Saku and Marks sticks back and fourth at least ten times before Mark slammed it home. Good Times.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:
Permalink Closed

Actually I was being sarcastic.  Glad they're gone, especially Tucker.  But, of all those dudes, Recchi would be the only one I'd take back.  And if any GM was faced with Czerkaski for Asham, they'd all have taken Czerkawski.  But that's old news and I was just being silly.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 219
Date:
Permalink Closed

Malakhov's play this season so far has been brutal! I should know cause he's on my fantasy team and I really need more out of this guy. That was only his second point in 7 games and with all that time on the ice he gets...which is about 24:00 mins a game, and an average of 6:00 mins on the powerplay each game...he should be racking them up. Not to mention his +/- is at -5. What an underachiever. Ahhh come on Malakhov I need more points!!

-- Edited by Kendich at 03:06, 2005-10-21

__________________


bleeding bleu, blanc et rouge


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3191
Date:
Permalink Closed

One thing I have discovered one thing about being a GM..hindsite is 20 20 and players will always get better as soon as you trade em..Murphy's law.

__________________
________________ I'm as confused as a starving baby in a topless bar!
ray


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 335
Date:
Permalink Closed

best thing we did was getting rid of Darcy Tucker, I hate the guy the most out of any hockey player ever, and I've met him in person.

__________________
Ray
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard